Researchers at the Department of Energy's Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) have identified 14 genes that regulate genomic integrity, which were consistently overexpressed in a wide variety of cancers. In the new study—“Centromere and kinetochore gene misexpression predicts cancer patient survival and response to radiotherapy and chemotherapy”—which was published recently in Nature Communications, the investigators created a scoring system based upon the degree of gene overexpression: the higher the score, the worse the prognosis. Moreover, the scores could accurately predict patient response to specific cancer treatments for several different cancer types. The Berkeley Lab team is hopeful that these findings will help doctors and their cancer patients decide if a particular therapy would be worth pursuing.
“The history of cancer treatment is filled with overreaction,” explained senior study investigator, Gary Karpen, Ph.D., senior scientist in Berkeley Lab's Division of Biological Systems and Engineering with a joint appointment at UC Berkeley's Department of Molecular and Cell Biology. “It is part of the ethics of cancer treatment to err on the side of overtreatment, but these treatments have serious side effects associated with them. For some people, it may be causing more trouble than if the growth was left untreated.”
One of the challenges is that there has been no reliable way to determine at an early stage if patients will respond to chemotherapy and radiation therapy. The authors believe their research could lead to a new biomarker for the initial stages of tumor development. The information obtained could help reduce the use of cancer treatments that have a low probability of being effective.
“Even for early stage cancer patients, such as lung cancers, adjuvant chemotherapy, and radiotherapy are routinely used in treatment, but overtreatment is a major challenge,” noted lead study investigator Weiguo Zhang, Ph.D., a project scientist at Berkeley Lab. “For certain types of early-stage lung cancer patients, there are estimates that adjuvant chemotherapy improves five-year survival only about 10 percent, on average, which is not great considering the collateral damage caused by this treatment.”
The researchers noted there are many factors a doctor and patient must consider in treatment decisions, but their biomarker results could become a valuable tool when deciding whether to use a particular therapy or not.
“These findings are very exciting,” remarked study co-author Anshu Jain, M.D., an oncologist at the Ashland Bellefonte Cancer Center in Kentucky and a clinical instructor at the Yale School of Medicine. “The biomarker score provides predictive and prognostic information separate from, and independent of, clinical and pathologic tumor characteristics that oncologists have available today and which often provide only limited clinical value.”
The new study focuses on genes that regulate the function of centromeres and kinetochores—the essential sites on chromosomes that spindle fibers attach to during cell division. The new findings build upon earlier research by Dr. Karpen’s group and other labs in the field. In normal cell division, microtubule spindles latch on to the kinetochores, pulling the chromosome's two chromatids apart. Dr. Karpen’s previous work found that fruit flies overexpress a specific centromere protein resulting in extra spindle attachment sites on the chromosomes.
“This essentially makes new centromeres functional at more than one place on the chromosome, and this is a huge problem because the spindle tries to connect to all the sites,” Dr. Karpen stated. “If you have two or more of these sites on the chromosome, the spindles are pulling in too many directions, and you end up breaking the chromosome during cell division. So overexpression of these genes may be a major contributing factor to chromosomal instability, which is a hallmark of all cancers.”
While chromosomal instability has long been recognized as a characteristic of cancer, its cause has remained unclear. To determine if centromeres play a role in chromosome instability for cancer, the researchers analyzed many public datasets that together contained thousands of human clinical tumor samples from at least a dozen types of cancers. The researchers screened 31 genes involved in regulating centromere and kinetochore function to find the 14 that were consistently overexpressed in cancer tissue.
The extensive records allowed the researchers to correlate the centromere and kinetochore gene expression score (CES) with patient outcomes either with or without treatments.
“We were surprised to find such a strong correlation between CES and things like whether the patient survived five years later,” said Dr. Karpen. “Another finding – one that is counterintuitive – is that high expression of these centromere genes is also related to more effective chemotherapy and radiation therapy.”
The Berkeley Lab group hypothesized that the degree of chromosomal instability might also make cancer cells more vulnerable to the effects of chemotherapy or radiation therapy.
“In other words, there's a threshold of genome instability,” commented Dr. Zhang. “At low to medium-high levels, the cancer thrives. But at much higher levels, the cancer cells are more susceptible to the additional DNA damage caused by the treatment. This is a really key point.”
Although their findings were exciting, the study authors caution that translating these findings into clinical advice and practice will take more research. The team is currently working to find that threshold of genome instability so that in the future, doctors and patients can make informed decisions about how to move forward.
“Future steps will include investigating the CES in prospective clinical studies for validation in carefully selected patient cohorts,” Dr. Jain concluded. “By establishing the clinical significance of the CES, oncologists will have greater confidence in guiding cancer patients toward treatments with the greatest benefit.”