While our understanding of the genetics and molecular mechanisms underlying autism spectrum disorder (ASD) continue to improve, having better diagnostic tools that can accurately asses the chances the disease will arise in offspring is critical information many would-be parents crave. Many researchers believe both genetics and the environment play a role. In some cases, the disorder is linked to de novo mutations that appear only in the child and are not inherited from either parent’s DNA. Now a team of investigators at the University of California (UC), San Diego, School of Medicine describes a method to measure disease-causing mutations found only in the sperm of the father, providing a more accurate assessment of ASD risk in future children.
Findings from the new study were posted recently in Nature Medicine through an article titled “Autism risk in offspring can be assessed through quantification of male sperm mosaicism.”
“Autism afflicts 1 in 59 children and we know that a significant portion is caused by these de novo DNA mutations, yet we are still blind to when and where these mutations will occur,” explained co-senior study investigator Jonathan Sebat, Ph.D., professor and chief of the Beyster Center for Molecular Genomics of Neuropsychiatric Diseases at UC San Diego School of Medicine. “With our new study, we can trace some of these mutations back to the father, and we can directly assess the risk of these same mutations occurring again in future children.”
Recent studies suggest gene-damaging de novo mutations are involved in at least 10–30% of ASD cases, with the number of mutations rising with the father’s age at the time of conception. De novo mutations occur spontaneously in parents’ sperm or eggs or during fertilization. The mutation is then present in each cell as the fertilized egg divides. Studies now point to male sperm as a particularly important source of these mutations, with the chance of the mutation recurring within the same family generally estimated at 1–3%.
“However, such estimates are not based on actual knowledge of the risk in an individual family, but instead are based on frequencies in the general population,” noted co-senior study investigator Joseph Gleeson, MD, professor of neuroscience at UC San Diego School of Medicine and director of neuroscience research at the Rady Children’s Institute for Genomic Medicine. “When a disease-causing mutation occurs for the first time in a family, the probability that it could happen again in future offspring is not known. Thus, families must make a decision with a great deal of uncertainty.”
In the current study, the researchers analyzed the sperm of eight fathers who were already parents of children with ASD. The goal was to look for the presence of multiple, genetically different material in cells in the same person, a phenomenon called mosaicism. Using deep whole-genome sequencing, they found variants in offspring that were matched only in the fathers’ sperm.
“We measured sperm mosaicism using deep-whole-genome sequencing, for variants both present in an offspring and evident only in father’s sperm, and identified single-nucleotide, structural, and short tandem-repeat variants,” the authors wrote. “We found that mosaicism quantification can stratify autism spectrum disorders recurrence risk due to de novo mutations into a vast majority with near 0% recurrence and a small fraction with a substantially higher and quantifiable risk, and we identify novel mosaic variants at risk for transmission to a future offspring.”
Lead author Martin Breuss, PhD, an assistant project scientist in Gleeson’s lab added that “while medical textbooks teach us that every cell in the body has an identical copy of DNA, this is fundamentally not correct. Mutations occur every time a cell divides, so no two cells in the body are genetically identical. Mosaicism can cause cancer or can be silent in the body.”
Breuss continued, stating that “if a mutation occurs early in development, then it will be shared by many cells within the body. But if a mutation happens just in sperm, then it can show up in a future child but not cause any disease in the father.”
The researchers determined that disease-causing mutations were present in up to 15% of the fathers’ sperm cells, information that could not be determined through other means, such as blood samples.
“My laboratory has a long-standing interest in understanding the origins of pediatric brain disease, and how mutations contribute to disease in a child,” said Gleeson. “We previously showed that mosaicism in a child can lead to diseases like epilepsy. Here, we show that mosaicism in one of the parents is at least as important when thinking about genetic counseling.”
If developed into a clinical test, the researchers said fathers could have their sperm studied to determine their precise risk of recurrence in future children. The methods might also be applied to men that haven’t had children yet, but who want to know the risk of having a child with a disease.